Letter
Suplica
The Earl Grey.
stating that their request to Mead's Jardine Matteson He
from the Colonial Sect
5
4444
Enkey
Sir,
Copy
Sie
Violina, Hongkong
113
In reply to your letter of the 27th December in Reference to the Bills of Costs in the two Cases noted in Margin, I beg respectively to state for the information of His Excellency The Governor, that in the case of J. F. Davie, first Bart: De. Ching. Cheong v. Little Livingston, I have had to pay an amounting to 341 Dollars, and fifty cents.
and the fact of Ching-cheong being unable to pay his debt, is certainly not my fault.
though if the fault be Mr. Zemres for claiming the money from him, & not from the Tenants there.
M. Jamentis tops on the public.
the Officer whom I have seen no account of having taken place, & I cannot help thinking that the case is rather doubtful as regards the charge of extortion which he preferred.
A1.25/3/45
cause taken has been correct.
Menurse, it is simpler that the maker ingainst him preventing me from receiving any lainer WV Campbete with to Tarrant
Received 7 Inclosures.
The Queen vs. Ching. Cheong.
Mr N. Z'2. Parker, Crown Solicitor, Reporting repayment to me of $52.50 paid by Livingston, and in the cases The Queen vs. Ching. Cheong.
Unless you I presume that at the time the statement by Mr. Merivale.
On the second case I beg to enclose four letters, by which it will be evident that no blame can be attributable to me in consequence of the action not proceeding against Mr Livingston; and on Referring to the Allowry Goveral's Remark on enclosure. V. 3 it will appear that Mr Livingstone was liable for Mr. Livi
Page 120
Page 121
بهار مرسه
Letter
Suplica
The Earl Grey.
stating that their request to to Mead's Jardine Matteson He
from the folonial sect
5
4444
Enkey
Sir
Copy
Sie
Violina, Hongkong
113
Se reply to your letter of the 27th December in Reference to the Bills of Costs tive Cases noted in Margin, I beg
in the two the
tion of
Respectively to state
to state for the informat His Excellency The Governor, that in the
I have had to pay jeer.
J. F. Davie, first
Bart: De.
Ching. Cheong .
Litte
V.
Case
amounting to 341. Wollars, and gifty cents.
and the
the
fact of Ching- cheong being unable to pay his dent, is certainly
Sivingston. fault of mine.
propices of the meas
wheen on as adquat
saulion
Etta
though if the fault be Mr.
Zemres
for claimey the moxy, him, & not thening the Tenents there.
M. Jamentis
tops on the public.
thee Officer whom
growled,
25/3.
Caima
Jee
I have seen no account
"' having latton place, & d cannel helf thinking that the case is No rather douttful as squid then
of robustion which he preferred.
here afford no information whatever to chatte no to
A1.25/3/45
couse taken has been conect a
Menurse, t
"present as
It is simpler that the
: they maker ingainst him
preventi me kom receury any
a lainer WV Campbete with to Tarrant
ات
Received
7 Inclosures.
The Queen UT.
him. into Court,
Solicitor, of $52.50 paid by
Mr N. Z'2. Parker, Crown
Reporting repayment to
Livingston, and
in the cases
The Queen vs. Ching. Cheong.
meant by th7
Rome to me
Las reve been
Mr. Merivale.
Unless you
I prercome that
at the
th
the stater
On the second case
Abeg
21
to enclose
four letters, by which it will be wident that no blame can be attributable to me
in c.
consequence of
of the action not proceeding against Mr Livingston ; andon Referring to the Allowry Goveral's Remark on enclosure. V. 3 it will appear that the
Mr Livingstone
Croon
was
hable for Mr. Livi
Page 120Page 121
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.